BY ROGER M. BALANZA
Mindanao Insider Daily
Oh, Danny Boy!
Davao City councilor Danny Dayanghirang crucified us on Tuesday last week with his privilege speech at the Davao City Council putting us to task for an alleged erroneous news reports we wrote about his privilege speech two weeks back.
In that speech—carried live by local cable, aired on the city’s two afternoon television news programs and reported in most of the local radio stations—Dayanghirang castigated this corner for reportedly misreporting on his previous privilege speech where he slammed Maa barangay officials led by barangay captain Jun Laud for their culpability in the suicide-death of 12-year old grader Mariannet Amper.
In the privilege speech, Dayanghirang called us a “liar,” coupling that unsavory adjective with a painful accusation that we are making up stories pitting him with Laud and his barangay council.
Laud of course strongly reacted to the Dayanghirang speech—apparently after taking a cue from my news reports—the reason why the councilor had to shield his self at my expense. A week after indicting laud for the Amper death in the November 20 privilege speech, Dayanghirang mysteriously suffered from a case of forced amnesia to say that what I wrote—I was present at the said session to hear the uncalled for verbal attack against Laud—was the product of my own imagination.
Oh, Danny Boy!
Yesterday, I took the pains to secure a copy from the records division of the Davao City Council of the transcript of the November 20 privilege speech of the honorable councilor.
Councilor Danny, according to the transcript, lied to his teeth when he said in his last week’s privilege speech that I made up stories in the news reports about his privilege speech two weeks ago where he blamed Laud and company for the death of the Amper girl.
My own medical readings tell me that forced amnesia is not a debilitating disease and the sufferer may be brought to reality with a little guidance, which in this case the narration of the facts of the case from the records of what is true as documented by the city council itself.
Councilor Danny denying my report? This is what the transcript—part of it by the way—says about the Danny speech:
“I am just concerned and intrigued…on how the barangay officials of Maa reacted or extended assistance to the late…Mariannet Amper.”
“I have not seen any barangay official neither the barangay captain (of Maa) tinker into the problem of this innocent lady, Ms. Amper, and what they have done as far as their office is concerned.”
“The barangay government is the smallest government unit….supposed to be in the frontline of ….handling barangay constituent’s problems.”
“Under the law….barangay officials can be accused of negligence….can be ground for suspension or removal from office…for remiss of duties and responsibilities.”
“The lesson on how the barangay respond (ed) to the needs of its constituents in Maa should not be the kind of behavior of any barangay official….(which) is not a good example.
“I hope this will be an awakening incident that we, in public service should discharge our duties with the highest degree of responsibility. And failure to do so can be a ground for investigation by the….City Council.”
“In the proper time….I am toying with the idea that the DILG should closely monitor the barangay officials.”
With the transcript of his own speech based from council records staring at him, would councilor Danny continue to call me a liar?
Anyway, yesterday I asked in a formal letter floor leader councilor Bonifacio Militar to give me a chance to correct Danny’s lies with the audio tape of his speech played today in the privilege hour where Danny showed he can lie to his teeth—in the spirit of fairness.
Will the honorable councilor oblige with this request?